ID Mashup Tuesday AM

by relaxedguy on June 21, 2006

The Progress Bar read by people interested in emerging Internet marketing, technology, social media, reputation, virtual environments, blogs, the Boston Internet scene and much more. If you like what you see you should subscribe to my RSS feed or via email in the sidebar. Thanks for visiting!

Trust, Fairness and Sanctions in Digital Communities
http://www.identitymash-up.org/?page_id=5

Graphing social networks

I asked about: How do false-positive relationship indicators such as Myspace “Friend Trains” affect the perceived value of the network?

Like begging on Helio mobile network.

Bill W calls identifier (login) identity. If you are authorized to log in, you are identified and have a reputation.

MR: applet of social relationships, rudimentary tension indicators.

CB: gaming the system
citation of scientific journals- journal isi ippact factor
multiple eBay accounts
Fashion mention again

balance the cost of communication with strength of reputation

JD: The more shared info is, the less valuable.

UG: Napster overview

Bill W: re: earlier statement by JD, mona lisa is more valuable the more people view it.
permanent state of partial attention.

giving people potential power tools to gather reputation related information.
valuable if context is specific enough.
“ester’s slime train”

Create content once, reuse many times.

beginning to imagine dealing without knowing names. Reduce risk and Points of vulnerability.

Categorizing blogosphere, trackbacks, comments.

not enough clarity around the costs of gaming the system. Persistence is valuable.

Kaylia: Loyalty in social graph. Too dynamic to be useful.

Long Tail Markets, Social Commerce and Open Business Models

Greg Steltenphol, adina
started Odwalla
funny story about Coke Black.
underlying implicit value systems intersecting with markets.

MS guy: generate assertions.

Much said about user-centric identity, what about corporate?

More Fashion: embed brands into games via clothing.

Can I export my virtual model and share with retailers on my own?

KL: novelty arises from the edge.
long-tail production side.

How come people that want to meet me get removed from my “want to meet me” list when I express interest in meeting them?

Towards and Open Identity Layer and Trusted Exchange: What Might it Look Like?

Novell/MS “Open Mike” joke, ha.

Note to smartocracy folks: Get Smartocracy website to reload previous page when assigning proxy votes, saves a few clicks.

Kim Cameron: “sex and voting should be left in the physical world.” ROTFLOL

MR: defending killing bill to make anynoymous/spoofing phone #’s caller id, on side of rep with call centers in district.

WS Trust and SAML, coupons for a service or person to act as me.

MR: me asking about letting socially conscious companies contact me via phone. Mark says there are implicit opt-in rules in place.

MR: more people signup up for opt-out list than voted for both candidates in last election.

Think about starting a reputation-based “Do call” list.

Code and Law: How Should and Might They Mix?
JZ: sharp, quick, funny.

contextualizing approaches of identiy from beinw swung by limited-negative approach from people not as vocal or persuasive.

John Bliss IBM: anonymous systems
Relationship resoultion technology
one way salted hashes

34 attributes in EU passenger list.

Anonymous entity repository.
hashed dating is not personal data once it’s hashed!

ME: What is the best incentive for users to share personal info?

SB: biggest worry is we get driven to digital dictatorship faster.

ME: salt is a condiment, how to we build decentralized data stores?

JZ: Repeal Moore’s Law

MSguyincrowd: stop treating data like secrets.